Principal Features

Excellent Strength Up To 1500°F (816°C), Good Oxidation Resistance, and Good Resistance to Aqueous Corrosion

HAYNES® 625 alloy (UNS N06625) is a nickel- chromium-molybdenum alloy with excellent strength from room temperature up to about 1500°F (816°C).  At higher temperatures, its strength is generally lower than that of other solid-solution strengthened alloys.  Alloy 625 has good oxidation resistance at temperatures up to 1800°F (982°C) and provides good resistance to aqueous corrosion, but generally not as effectively as modern HASTELLOY® corrosion- resistant alloys.

Easily Fabricated

HAYNES® 625 alloy has excellent forming and welding characteristics.  It may be forged or otherwise hot-worked providing temperature is maintained in the range of about 1800 to 2150°F (982 to 1177°C).  Ideally, to control grain size, finish hot working operations should be performed at the lower end of the temperature range.  Because of its good ductility, alloy 625 is also readily formed by cold working. However, the alloy does work-harden rapidly so intermediate annealing treatments may be needed for complex component forming operations.

In order to restore the best balance of properties, all hot- or cold-worked parts should be annealed and rapidly cooled.

The alloy can be welded by both manual and automatic welding methods, including gas tungsten arc (GTAW), gas metal arc (GMAW), electron beam, and resistance welding. It exhibits good restraint welding characteristics.

Heat Treatment

Unless otherwise specified, wrought HAYNES® 625 alloy is normally supplied in the mill-annealed condition.  The alloy is usually mill-annealed at 1925°F plus or minus 25°F (1052°C plus or minus 14°C) for a time commensurate with section thickness and rapidly cooled or water-quenched for optimum properties.  Depending on customer requirements, alloy 625 may also be supplied solution heat-treated at temperatures at or above 2000°F (1093°C), or mill annealed at temperatures below 1925°F (1052°C).   Lower temperature mill annealing treatments may result in some precipitation of second phases in alloy 625 which can affect the alloy’s properties.

Applications

HAYNES® 625 alloy is widely used in a variety of high- temperature aerospace, chemical process industry, and power industry applications.  It provides excellent service in short- term applications at temperatures up to approximately 1500°F (814°C); however, for long-term elevated temperature service, use of alloy 625 is best restricted to a maximum of 1100°F (593°C).  Long-term thermal exposure of alloy 625 above 1100°F (593°C) will result in significant embrittlement.  For service at these temperatures, more modern materials, such as HAYNES® 230® alloy, are recommended.

As a low-temperature corrosion-resistant material, alloy 625 has been widely used in chemical process industry, sea water, and power plant scrubber applications.  However, in most current requirements it has largely been superseded by more capable HASTELLOY® alloys, such as C-22® and G-30® alloys.

*Please contact our technical support team if you have technical questions about this alloy.

Nominal Composition

Weight %
Nickel 62 Balance
Cobalt 1 max.
Iron 5 max.
Chromium 21
Molybdenum 9
Niobium* + Tantalum 3.7
Manganese 0.5 max.
Silicon 0.5 max.
Aluminum 0.4 max.
Titanium 0.4 max.
Carbon 0.1 max.

*Also known as Columbium

Tensile Properties

Cold-Rolled and 1925°F (1052°C) Mill-Annealed, Sheet

Test Temperature 0.2% Yield Strength Ultimate Tensile Strength Elongation
°F °C ksi MPa ksi MPa %
RT RT 71.2 491 133.9 923 47.5
1000 538 56.3 388 118.4 816 54.2
1200 649 55.1 380 117.7 811 109.3
1400 760 53.8 371 71.0 490 135.0
1600 871 29.6 204 34.7 239 160.6
1800 982 9.9 68 15.3 106 154.5
2000 1093 5.0 35 8.7 60 128.3

Hot-Rolled and 1925°F (1052°C) Mill-Annealed, Plate

Test Temperature 0.2% Yield Strength Ultimate Tensile Strength Elongation
°F °C ksi MPa ksi MPa %
RT RT 60.5 417 129.6 894 48
800* 427* 46.4 320 116.1 800 51.5
1000 538 44.8 309 112.3 774 52.1
1200 649 43.7 301 112.7 777 80.3
1400 760 43.7 301 71.1 490 102.2
1600 871 30.6 211 38.0 262 115.7
1800 982 11.8 81 17.3 119 120.7
2000 1093 5.4 37 9.3 64 135.1

*Average of results for only two products
RT=Room Temperature

Comparative Elevated Temperature Yield Strengths, Sheet

Creep and Rupture Properties

HAYNES 625 Sheet, Solution Annealed

Temperature Creep Approximate Initial Stress to Produce Specified Creep in
10 h 100 h 1,000 h
°F °C % ksi MPa ksi MPa ksi MPa
1100 593 0.5 75 517 69 476 64 441
1 76 524 71 490 67 462
R - - 90 621 80 552
1200 649 0.5 53 365 52 359 50 345
1 58 400 53 365 51 352
R 84 579 74 510 55 379
1300 704 0.5 33 228 30 207 26 179
1 36 248 31 214 27 186
R 68* 469* 49 338 33 228
1400 760 0.5 18.4 127 13.0 90 9.7 67
1 20 138 14.5 100 11.5 79
R 41 283 27 186 17.8 123
1500 816 0.5 9.7 67 5.7 39 3.2 22
1 11.3 78 7.0 48 4.2 29
R 24 165 15.2 105 9.9 68
1600 871 0.5 5.2 36 2.6 18 1.2 8.3
1 6.2 43 3.3 23 1.6 11
R 14.0 97 8.0 55 4.2 29
1700 927 0.5 2.6 18 1.1 7.6 - -
1 3.4 23 1.7 12 - -
R 8.0* 55* 4.3 30 2.7 19
1800 982 0.5 1.2 8.3 - - - -
1 1.7 12 0.5 3.4 - -
R 4.1 28 2.6 18 1.4 10

*Significant extrapolation

Comparison of Stress to Produce 1% Creep in 1,000 Hours

Thermal Stability

HAYNES® 625 alloy is similar to the solid-solution-strengthened superalloys, such as HAYNES® 188 alloy or HASTELLOY® X alloy, which will precipitate deleterious phases upon long- term exposure at intermediate temperatures.  In this case, the phase in question is NiCb delta- phase which serves to impair both tensile ductility and impact strength.  For applications where thermal stability is important, 230® alloy is recommended.

Room Temperature Properties After Thermal Exposure, Plate

Exposure h 0.2% Offset Yield Strength Ultimate Tensile Strength Elongation Impact
°F °C h ksi MPa ksi MPa % ft.-lb. J
As-annealed* 66.2 456 127.7 880 46 81 110
1200 649 1000 122.3 843 165.0 1138 28 11 15
4000 117.9 813 163.6 1128 24 8 11
8000 117.8 812 164.2 1132 18 5 7
16000 118.5 817 165.4 1140 12 4 5
1400 760 1000 95.5 658 142.9 985 17 5 7
4000 104.1 718 145.5 1003 12 4 5
8000 97.4 672 142.6 983 13 5 7
16000 96.1 663 140.4 968 12 4 5
1600 871 1000 68.3 471 130.0 896 30 12 16
4000 66.4 458 130.0 896 29 11 15
8000 63.7 439 127.0 876 26 15 20
16000 63.4 437 128.4 885 32 14 19

*1875°F (1024°C), rapid cooled

Oxidation Resistance

Comparative Burner Rig Oxidation Resistance, 1000 Hours

Burner rig oxidation tests were conducted by exposing samples 3/8 in. x 2.5 in. x thickness (9 mm x 64 mm x thickness), in a rotating holder, to products of combustion of a mixture of No. 1 and No. 2 fuel oil. This was burned at a ratio of air to fuel of about 50:1 for 1000 hours.  (Gas velocity was about 0.3 mach). Samples were automatically removed from the gas stream every 30 minutes, fan-cooled to near ambient temperature, and then reinserted into the flame tunnel.

Alloy 1800°F (982°C)
Metal Loss Average Metal Affected Maximum Metal Affected
mils µm mils µm mils µm
230® 0.8 20 2.8 71 3.5 89
X 2.7 69 5.6 142 6.4 153
625 4.9 124 7.1 180 7.6 193
25 6.2 157 8.3 211 8.7 221
MULTIMET® 11.8 300 14.4 366 14.8 376
800H® 12.7 312 14.5 368 15.3 389

Oxidation Resistance in Flowing Air (1008 Hours)

The following are static oxidation test rankings for 1008-hour exposures in flowing air. The samples were cycled to room temperature weekly. Average metal affected is the sum of metal loss plus average internal penetration.

Alloy 1600°F (871°C) 1800°F (982°C)
Metal Loss Avg. Met. Aff. mils, (mm) Metal Loss Avg. Met. Aff. mils, (mm)
mils μm mils μm mils μm mils μm
214® 0 0 0.1 3 0.1 3 0.3 8
188 0.1 3 1.1 28
230® 0 0 0.6 15 0.2 5 1.5 38
X 0.1 3 0.7 18 0.2 5 1.5 38
625 0.1 3 0.6 15 0.4 10 1.9 48
617 0.3 8 2.0 51
25 0.3 8 2.0 51
HR‐120® 0.1 3 0.9 23 0.4 10 2.1 53
556® 0.4 10 2.3 58
800HT 0.1 3 1.0 25 0.5 13 4.1 104
HR‐160® 0.2 5 3.0 79 0.7 18 5.5 140

(Cycled weekly); alloys are arranged in ascending order by the average metal affected.

Amount of metal affected for high‐temperature sheet (0.060 ‐0.125”) alloys exposed for 360 days (8,640‐h) in flowing air at 1600°F (871°C) (Cycled once‐a‐month)

Alloy Metal Loss Avg. Met. Aff.
mils μm mils μm
214® 0.1 3 0.2 5
625 0.3 8 1.4 36
230® 0.2 5 1.4 36
617 0.3 8 1.6 41
HR‐120® 0.3 8 1.6 41
25 0.3 8 1.7 43
188 0.2 5 1.8 46
556® 0.3 8 1.9 48
X 0.3 8 2.2 56
800HT 0.4 10 2.9 74

Comparative Dynamic Oxidation

Alloy 1600°F (871°C), 2000 h, 30-min cycles 1800°F (982°C), 1000 h, 30-min cycles
Metal Loss Average Metal Affected Metal Loss Average Metal Affected
mils µm mils µm mils µm mils µm
188 1.1 28 2.9 74 1.1 28 3.2 81
230® 0.9 23 3.9 99 2.8 71 5.6 142
617 2.0 51 7.8 198 2.4 61 5.7 145
625 1.2 30 2.2 56 3.7 94 6.0 152
556® 1.5 38 3.9 99 4.1 104 6.7 170
X 1.7 43 5.3 135 4.3 109 7.3 185
HR-120® 6.3 160 8.3 211
RA330 2.5 64 5.0 127 8.7 221 10.5 267
HR-160® 5.4 137 11.9 302
310SS 6.0 152 7.9 201 16.0 406 18.3 465
800H 3.9 99 9.4 239 22.9 582 Through Thickness

Amount of metal affected for high-temperature sheet alloys exposed for 1008h
(cycled weekly) in air + 10%H2O

Alloy 1600°F (871°C) 1800°F (982°C)
Metal Loss Avg. Met. Aff. Metal Loss Avg. Met. Aff.
mils μm mils μm mils μm mils μm
214® 0.1 1 0.3 7 0.0 1 0.2 6
188 0.1 3 1.4 36
230® 0.1 2 0.5 13 0.2 4 1.5 37
625 0.1 3 0.5 12 0.3 8 1.6 41
X 0.0 1 0.5 13 0.3 7 1.8 45
HR-120® 0.1 2 0.7 17 0.3 9 1.9 49
617 0.1 2 0.9 22 0.3 8 2.0 51

Metallographic Technique used for Evaluating Environmental Tests

Physical Properties

Physical Property British Units Metric Units
Density RT
0.305lb/in3
RT
8.44 g/cm3
Melting Range 2350-2460°F 1288-1349°C
Electrical Resistivity RT 50.8 µohm-in RT 129 µohm-cm
200°F 52.0 µohm-in 100°C 132 µohm-cm
400°F 52.8 µohm-in 200°C 134 µohm-cm
600°F 53.1 µohm-in 300°C 135 µohm-cm
800°F 53.5 µohm-in 400°C 136 µohm-cm
1000°F 54.3 µohm-in 500°C 137 µohm-cm
1200°F 54.3 µohm-in 600°C 138 µohm-cm
1400°F 53.9 µohm-in 700°C 138 µohm-cm
1600°F 53.5 µohm-in 800°C 137 µohm-cm
1800°F 53.1 µohm-in 900°C 136 µohm-cm
1000°C 135 µohm-cm
Thermal Conductivity RT
68 Btu-in/ft2-hr-°F
RT 9.8 W/m-°C
200°F
75 Btu-in/ft2-hr-°F
100°C 10.9 W/m-°C
400°F
87 Btu-in/ft2-hr-°F
200°C 12.5 W/m-°C
600°F
98 Btu-in/ft2-hr-°F
300°C 13.9 W/m-°C
800°F
109 Btu-in/ft2-hr-°F
400°C 15.3 W/m-°C
1000°F
121 Btu-in/ft2-hr-°F
500°C 16.9 W/m-°C
1200°F
132 Btu-in/ft2-hr-°F
600°C 18.3 W/m-°C
1400°F
144 Btu-in/ft2-hr-°F
700°C 19.8 W/m-°C
1600°F
158 Btu-in/ft2-hr-°F
800°C 21.5 W/m-°C
1800°F
175 Btu-in/ft2-hr-°F
900°C 23.4 W/m-°C
1000°C 25.6W/m-°C
Specific Heat RT 0.098 Btu/lb.-°F RT 410 J/Kg-°C
200°F 0.102 Btu/lb.-°F 100°C 428 J/Kg-°C
400°F 0.109 Btu/lb.-°F 200°C 455 J/Kg-°C
600°F 0.115 Btu/lb.-°F 300°C 477 J/Kg-°C
800°F 0.122 Btu/lb.-°F 400°C 503 J/Kg-°C
1000°F 0.128 Btu/lb.-°F 500°C 527 J/Kg-°C
1200°F 0.135 Btu/lb.-°F 600°C 552 J/Kg-°C
1400°F 0.141 Btu/lb.-°F 700°C 576 J/Kg-°C
1600°F 0.148 Btu/lb.-°F 800°C 600 J/Kg-°C
1800°F 0.154 Btu/lb.-°F 900°C 625 J/Kg-°C
- - 1000°C 648 J/Kg-°C
Mean Coefficient of Thermal Expansion 70-200°F 7.1 µin/in-°F 25-100°C
12.8 x 10-6 µm/m- °C
70-400°F 7.3 µin/in-°F 25-200°C
13.1 x 10-6 µm/m- °C
70-600°F 7.5 µin/in-°F 25-300°C
13.4 x 10-6 µm/m- °C
70-800°F 7.7 µin/in-°F 25-400°C
13.8 x 10-6 µm/m- °C
70-1000°F 8.0 µin/in-°F 25-500°C
14.2 x 10-6 µm/m- °C
70-1200°F 8.4 µin/in-°F 25-600°C
14.8 x 10-6 µm/m- °C
70-1400°F 8.7 µin/in-°F 25-700°C
15.4 x 10-6 µm/m- °C
70-1600°F 9.2 µin/in-°F 25-800°C
16.0 x 10-6 µm/m- °C
70-1800°F 9.6 µin/in-°F 25-900°C
16.7 x 10-6 µm/m- °C
- - 25-1000°C
17.4 x 10-6 µm/m- °C
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity RT
30.2 x 106 psi
RT 208 GPa
200°F
29.2 x 106 psi
100°C 201 GPa
400°F
28.8 x 106 psi
200°C 199 GPa
600°F
27.7 x 106 psi
300°C 192 GPa
800°F
26.7 x 106 psi
400°C 186 GPa
1000°F
25.6 x 106 psi
500°C 179 GPa
1200°F
24.3 x 106 psi
600°C 171 GPa
1400°F
22.8 x 106 psi
700°C 163 GPa
1600°F
21.2 x 106 psi
800°C 153 GPa
1800°F
18.7 x 106 psi
900°C 142 GPa
- - 1000°C 126 GPa

RT = Room Temperature

Iso-Corrosion Diagrams

Each of these iso-corrosion diagrams was constructed using numerous corrosion rate values, generated at different acid concentrations and temperatures. The blue line represents those combinations of acid concentration and temperature at which a corrosion rate of 0.1 mm/y (4 mils per year) is expected, based on laboratory tests in reagent grade acids. Below the line, rates under 0.1 mm/y are expected. Similarly, the red line indicates the combinations of acid concentration and temperature at which a corrosion rate of 0.5 mm/y (20 mils per year) is expected. Above the line, rates over 0.5 mm/y are expected. Between the blue and red lines, corrosion rates are expected to fall between 0.1 and 0.5 mm/y.

Hydrobromic Acid

Concentration 50°F 75°F 100°F 125°F 150°F 175°F 200°F 225°F Boiling
Wt. % 10°C 24°C 38°C 52°C 66°C 79°C 93°C 107°C
2.5 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
5 <0.01 0.13 0.6
7.5 <0.01 <0.01 0.93
10 0.15 0.82
15 <0.01 0.3 0.64
20 0.1 0.16 0.33 0.65
25
30 0.11 0.21 0.34 0.72
40 0.08 0.15 0.25 0.42 0.79

All corrosion rates are in millimeters per year (mm/y); to convert to mils (thousandths of an inch) per year, divide by 0.0254.
Data are from Corrosion Laboratory Job 17-04.
All tests were performed in reagent grade acids under laboratory conditions; field tests are encouraged prior to industrial use.

Hydrochloric Acid

Concentration 50°F 75°F 100°F 125°F 150°F 175°F 200°F 225°F Boiling
Wt. % 10°C 24°C 38°C 52°C 66°C 79°C 93°C 107°C
1 <0.01 <0.01 0.23
1.5
2
2.5
3 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 2.07
3.5
4
4.5
5 <0.01 <0.01 4.65
7.5 0.07 0.49
10 <0.01 0.15 0.3 1.16
15 0.06 0.19 0.4 1.06
20 0.06 0.16 0.36 0.82

All corrosion rates are in millimeters per year (mm/y); to convert to mils (thousandths of an inch) per year, divide by 0.0254.
Data are from Corrosion Laboratory Jobs 56-97 and 3-98.
All tests were performed in reagent grade acids under laboratory conditions; field tests are encouraged prior to industrial use.

Sulfuric Acid

Concentration 75°F 100°F 125°F 150°F 175°F 200°F 225°F 250°F 275°F 300°F 350°F Boiling
Wt. % 24°C 38°C 52°C 66°C 79°C 93°C 107°C 121°C 135°C 149°C 177°C
1
2
3
4
5 <0.01 0.06 0.4
10 0.01 0.24 1.05
20 0.02 0.58 2.84
30 0.01 0.03 0.68
40 <0.01 0.02 0.58
50 0.01 0.89
60 <0.01 0.48 0.92
70 <0.01 0.23 0.63
80 0.05 0.31 0.91 2.54
90 <0.01 0.17 1.26 6.97
96

All corrosion rates are in millimeters per year (mm/y); to convert to mils (thousandths of an inch) per year, divide by 0.0254.
Data are from Corrosion Laboratory Jobs 57-97 and 4-98.
All tests were performed in reagent grade acids under laboratory conditions; field tests are encouraged prior to industrial use.

Comparative 0.1 mm/y Line Plots

To compare the performance of HAYNES® 625 alloy with that of other materials, it is useful to plot the 0.1 mm/y lines. In the following graphs, the lines for 625 alloy are compared with those of G-35 alloy, 254SMO alloy, and 316L stainless steel, in hydrochloric and sulfuric acids. The hydrochloric acid concentration limit of 20% is the azeotrope, above which corrosion tests are less reliable.

 

Selected Corrosion Data

Hydrobromic Acid

Conc.Wt.% 50°F 75°F 100°F 125°F 150°F 175°F 200°F 225°F Boiling
10°C 24°C 38°C 52°C 66°C 79°C 93°C 107°C
2.5 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
5 <0.01 0.13 0.60
7.5 <0.01 <0.01 0.93
10 0.15 0.82
15 <0.01 0.30 0.64
20 0.01 0.16 0.33 0.65
25
30 0.11 0.21 0.34 0.72
40 0.08 0.15 0.25 0.42 0.79

All corrosion rates are in millimeters per year (mm/y); to convert to mils (thousandths of an inch) per year, divide by 0.0254.
Data are from Corrosion Laboratory Job 17-04.
All tests were performed in reagent grade acids under laboratory conditions; field tests are encouraged prior to industrial use.

Hydrochloric Acid

Conc.Wt.% 50°F 75°F 100°F 125°F 150°F 175°F 200°F 225°F Boiling
10°C 24°C 38°C 52°C 66°C 79°C 93°C 107°C
1 <0.01 <0.01 0.23
1.5
2
2.5
3 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 2.07
3.5
4
4.5
5 <0.01 <0.01 4.65
7.5 0.07 0.49
10 <0.01 0.15 0.30 1.16
15 0.06 0.19 0.40 1.06
20 0.06 0.16 0.36 0.82

All corrosion rates are in millimeters per year (mm/y); to convert to mils (thousandths of an inch) per year, divide by 0.0254.
Data are from Corrosion Laboratory Jobs 56-97 and 3-98.
All tests were performed in reagent grade acids under laboratory conditions; field tests are encouraged prior to industrial use.

Sulfuric Acid

Conc.Wt.% 75°F 100°F 125°F 150°F 175°F 200°F 225°F 250°F 275°F 300°F 350°F Boiling
24°C 38°C 52°C 66°C 79°C 93°C 107°C 121°C 135°C 149°C 177°C
1
2
3
4
5 <0.01 0.06 0.40
10 0.01 0.24 1.05
20 0.02 0.58 2.84
30 0.01 0.03 0.68
40 <0.01 0.02 0.58
50 0.01 0.89
60 <0.01 0.48 0.92
70 <0.01 0.23 0.63
80 0.05 0.31 0.91 2.54
90 <0.01 0.17 1.26 6.97
96

All corrosion rates are in millimeters per year (mm/y); to convert to mils (thousandths of an inch) per year, divide by 0.0254.
Data are from Corrosion Laboratory Jobs 57-97 and 4-98.
All tests were performed in reagent grade acids under laboratory conditions; field tests are encouraged prior to industrial use.

Resistance to Pitting and Crevice Corrosion

HAYNES® 625 alloy exhibits good resistance to chloride-induced pitting and crevice attack, forms of corrosion to which some of the austenitic stainless steels are particularly prone. To assess the resistance of alloys to pitting and crevice attack, it is customary to measure their Critical Pitting Temperatures and Critical Crevice Temperatures in acidified 6 wt.% ferric chloride, in accordance with the procedures defined in ASTM Standard G 48. These values represent the lowest temperatures at which pitting and crevice attack are encountered in this solution, within 72 hours.

Alloy Critical Pitting Temperature Critical Crevice Temperature
in Acidified 6% FeCl3
in Acidified 6% FeCl3
°F °C °F °C
316L 59 15 32 0
254SMO 140 60 86 30
28 113 45 64 17.5
31 163 72.5 109 42.5
G-30® 154 67.5 100 37.5
G-35® 203 95 113 45
625 212 100 104 40

Resistance to Stress Corrosion Cracking

One of the chief attributes of the nickel alloys is their resistance to chloride-induced stress corrosion cracking. A common solution for assessing the resistance of materials to this extremely destructive form of attack is boiling 45% magnesium chloride (ASTM Standard G 36), typically with stressed U-bend samples. As is evident from the following results, 625 alloy is much more resistant to this form of attack than the comparative, austenitic stainless steels. The tests were stopped after 1,008 hours (six weeks).

Alloy Time to Cracking
316L 2 h
254SMO 24 h
28 36 h
31 36 h
G-30® 168 h
G-35® No Cracking in 1,008 h
625 No Cracking in 1,008 h

Fabrication

Heat Treatment

HAYNES® 625 alloy is normally final annealed at 1925°F (1052°C) for a time commensurate with section thickness. Annealing during fabrication can be performed at even lower temperatures, but a final subsequent anneal at 1925°F (1052°C) is usually required to produce optimum structure and properties.  Please see Haynes International publication H-3159 for further information.

 Effect of Cold Reduction Upon Room-Temperature Properties

Cold Reduction Subsequent Anneal Temperature 0.2% Yield Strength Ultimate Tensile Strength Elongation Hardness
% ksi MPa ksi MPa % HR C/BW
None None 70 483 133 917 46 97 HRBW
10 None 113 779 151 1041 30 32 HRC
20 140 965 169 1165 16 37 HRC
30 162 1117 191 1317 11 40 HRC
40 178 1227 209 1441 8 42 HRC
50 184 1268 223 1538 5 45 HRC
10 1850°F (1010°C) 63 434 134 924 46
20 71 490 138 951 44
30 78 538 141 972 44
40 82 565 141 972 42
50 82 565 141 972 42
10 1950°F (1065°C) 61 421 133 915 46
20 71 490 137 945 45
30 77 531 140 965 44
40 83 572 142 979 42
50 82 565 141 972 42
10 2050°F (1120°C) 58 400 128 883 50
20 67 462 135 931 46
30 58 400 127 876 52
40 72 496 137 945 44
50 61 421 130 896 50
10 2150°F (1175°C) 52 359 122 841 55
20 54 372 124 855 55
30 53 365 122 841 56
40 52 359 122 841 55
50 51 352 119 820 58

*Tensile results are averages of two or more tests.
*Rapid Air Cool
HRC = Hardness Rockwell “C”.
HRBW = Hardness Rockwell “B”, Tungsten Indentor.

Welding

HAYNES® 625 alloy is readily welded by Gas Tungsten Arc (GTAW), Gas Metal Arc (GMAW), electron beam welding, and resistance welding techniques. Its welding characteristics are similar to those for HASTELLOY® X alloy. Submerged-Arc welding is not recommended as this process is characterized by high heat input to the base metal and slow cooling of the weld. These factors can increase weld restraint and promote cracking.

Base Metal Preparation

The welding surface and adjacent regions should be thoroughly cleaned with an appropriate solvent prior to any welding operation.   All greases, oils, cutting oils, crayon marks, machining solutions, corrosion products, paint, scale, dye penetrant solutions, and other foreign matter should be completely removed. It is preferable, but not necessary, that the alloy be in the solution- annealed condition when welded.

Filler Metal Selection

Matching composition filler metal is recommended for joining 625 alloy. For dissimilar metal joining of 625 alloy to nickel-, cobalt-, or iron-base materials, 625 alloy itself, 230-W filler wire, 556 alloy, HASTELLOY® S alloy (AMS5838), or HASTELLOY® W alloy (AMS 5786, 5787) welding products are suggested, depending upon the particular case. Please click here or see the Haynes Welding SmartGuide for more information.

Preheating, Interpass Temperatures, and Postweld Heat Treatment

Preheat is not required. Preheat is generally specified as room temperature (typical shop conditions).   Interpass temperature should be maintained below 200°F (93°C). Auxiliary cooling methods may be used between weld passes, as needed, providing that such methods do not introduce contaminants. Postweld heat treatment is not generally required for X alloy.  For further information, please click here.

Nominal Welding Parameters

Details for GTAW, GMAW and SMAW welding are given here. Nominal welding parameters are provided as a guide for performing typical operations and are based upon welding conditions used in our laboratories.

Specifications and Codes

Specifications

HAYNES® 625 alloy (N06625, W86112)
Sheet, Plate & Strip AMS 5599SB 443/B 443AMS 5869P= 43
Billet, Rod & Bar AMS 5666SB 446/B 446B 472P= 43
Coated Electrodes SFA 5.11/ A 5.11(ENiCrMo-3)F= 43
Bare Welding Rods & Wire SFA 5.14/ A 5.14(ERNiCrMo-3)AMS 5837F=43
Seamless Pipe & Tube AMS 5581SB 444/B 444P= 43
Welded Pipe & Tube AMS 5581SB 704/B 704SB 705/B 705P= 43
Fittings SB 366/B 366P= 43
Forgings AMS 5666SB 564/B 564P= 43
DIN 17744 No. 2.4856NiCr22Mo9Nb
Others ASME Code Case No. 2468NACE MR0175ISO 15156

Codes

HAYNES® 625 alloy (N06625, W86112)
ASME Section l

Grade 1

1100ºF (593ºC)1

Code Case 2632

1200ºF (650ºC)2

Grade 2

1100ºF (593ºC)3

Code Case 1935

1000ºF (538ºC)3

Section lll Class 1
Grade 1800ºF (427ºC)3
Class 2
Grade 1800ºF (427ºC)4
Class 3
Grade 1800ºF (427ºC)4
Section lV HF-300.2
Section Vlll Div. 1
Grade 11200ºF (649ºC)1Grade 21600ºF (871ºC)31200ºF (649ºC)5
Div. 2
Grade 1800ºF (427ºC)5Code Case 2468800ºF (427ºC)6
B16.5
1200°F (649°C)8
B16.34
1200°F (649°C)6
B31.1

1200°F (649°C)1

B31.3

1200°F (649°C)6

MMPDS 6.3.3

1Plate, Sheet, Bar, Forgings, fittings, welded pipe/tube, seamless pipe/tube
2Plate, Sheet, welded pipe/tube
3Plate, Sheet, Bar, seamless pipe/tube
4Plate, Sheet, Bar, Forgings, welded pipe/tube, seamless pipe/tube
5Bolting
6Plate, Sheet, Bar, Forgings, seamless pipe/tube
7Plate, Sheet, Bar, seamless pipe/tube, Bolting
8Plate, Forgings

Disclaimer

Haynes International makes all reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy and correctness of the data displayed on this site but makes no representations or warranties as to the data’s accuracy, correctness or reliability. All data are for general information only and not for providing design advice. Alloy properties disclosed here are based on work conducted principally by Haynes International, Inc. and occasionally supplemented by information from the open literature and, as such, are indicative only of the results of such tests and should not be considered guaranteed maximums or minimums.  It is the responsibility of the user to test specific alloys under actual service conditions to determine their suitability for a particular purpose.

For specific concentrations of elements present in a particular product and a discussion of the potential health affects thereof, refer to the Safety Data Sheets supplied by Haynes International, Inc.  All trademarks are owned by Haynes International, Inc., unless otherwise indicated.

Alloy Brochure

Download