Principal Features

A nickel alloy with exceptional resistance to “fertilizer-grade” phosphoric acid

HASTELLOY® G-35® alloy (UNS N06035) was developed to resist “fertilizer-grade” phosphoric acid (P2O5), which is used in the production of fertilizers. Tests in real-world solutions indicate that G-35® alloy is far superior to other metallic materials in this acid. It was also developed to resist localized attack in the presence of chlorides, since this can be a problem beneath deposits in evaporators used to concentrate “fertilizer-grade” phosphoric acid. Furthermore, G-35® alloy is much less susceptible to chloride-induced stress corrosion cracking than the stainless steels and nickel-chromium-iron alloys traditionally used in “fertilizer-grade” phosphoric acid.

As a result of its very high chromium content, G-35® alloy is extremely resistant to other oxidizing acids, such as nitric, and mixtures containing nitric acid. It possesses moderate resistance to reducing acids, as a result of its appreciable molybdenum content, and, unlike other nickel-chromium-molybdenum alloys, it is very resistant to “caustic de-alloying” in hot sodium hydroxide.

HASTELLOY® G-35® alloy is available in the form of plates, sheets, strips, billets, bars, wires, pipes, tubes, and covered electrodes. Applications include P2O5 evaporator tubes.

*Please contact our technical support team if you have technical questions about this alloy.

Nominal Composition

Weight %
Nickel 58 Balance
Cobalt 1 max. 
Chromium 33.2
Molybdenum 8.1
Tungsten: 0.6 max. 
Iron 2 max.
Manganese 0.5 max.
Aluminum 0.4 max.
Silicon 0.6 max.
Carbon 0.05 max.
Copper 0.3 max. 

Resistance to “Fertilizer-grade” Phosphoric Acid

“Fertilizer-grade” phosphoric acid (P2O5), which is made by reacting phosphate rock with sulfuric acid, is one of the most important industrial chemicals, being the primary source of phosphorus for agrichemical fertilizers. As produced, it contains many impurities, and has a P2O5 concentration of only about 30%, because of the large amount of rinse water needed to separate it from the other main reaction product, calcium sulfate. Typical impurities include unreacted sulfuric acid, various metallic ions, fluoride ions, and chloride ions. The fluoride ions tend to form complexes with the metallic ions, and are therefore less of a problem than the chloride ions, which strongly influence electro chemical reactions between “fertilizer-grade” phosphoric acid and metallic materials. Particulate matter (for example, silica particles) can also be present in “fertilizer-grade” acid.The main use of metallic materials is in the concentration process, where the “fertilizer-grade” acid is taken through a series of evaporation steps, involving metallic tubing. Typically, the P2O5 concentration is raised to 54% during this process. The concentration effect upon the corrosivity of the acid is somewhat offset by the fact that the impurity levels drop as the concentration increases.

The following chart, comparing G-35® alloy with competitive materials, is based on tests in three concentrations (36, 48, and 54%) of “fertilizer-grade” phosphoric acid (supplied by a producer in Florida, USA) at 121°C (250°F).

Iso-Corrosion Diagrams

Each of these iso-corrosion diagrams was constructed using numerous corrosion rate values, generated at different acid concentrations and temperatures. The blue line represents those combinations of acid concentration and temperature at which a corrosion rate of 0.1 mm/y (4 mils per year) is expected, based on laboratory tests in reagent grade acids. Below the line, rates under 0.1 mm/y are expected. Similarly, the red line indicates the combinations of acid concentration and temperature at which a corrosion rate of 0.5 mm/y (20 mils per year) is expected. Above the line, rates over 0.5 mm/y are expected. Between the blue and red lines, corrosion rates are expected to fall between 0.1 and 0.5 mm/y.
          
             

Comparative 0.1 mm/y Line Plots

To compare the performance of HASTELLOY G-35 alloy with that of other materials, it is useful to plot the 0.1 mm/y lines. In the following graphs, the lines for G-35 alloy are compared with those of 625 alloy, 254SMO alloy, and 316L stainless steel, in hydrochloric and sulfuric acids. Note that the lines for G-35 alloy are close to those for 625 alloy. The hydrochloric acid concentration limit of 20% is the azeotrope, above which corrosion tests are less reliable.

       

Selected Corrosion Data

Hydrobromic Acid

Conc. Wt.% 50°F 75°F 100°F 125°F 150°F 175°F 200°F 225°F Boiling
10°C 24°C 38°C 52°C 66°C 79°C 93°C 107°C
2.5 - - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - <0.01
5 - - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - <0.01
7.5 - - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - 0.02
10 - - - - <0.01 <0.01 1.12 - -
15 - - - - <0.01 0.41 1.89 - -
20 - - - <0.01 0.44 1.12 - - -
25 - - - - - - - - -
30 - 0.01 0.14 0.26 0.46 0.84 - - -
40 - - 0.10 0.17 0.31 0.48 - - -

All corrosion rates are in millimeters per year (mm/y); to convert to mils (thousandths of an inch) per year, divide by 0.0254.
Data are from Corrosion Laboratory Job 17-04.
All tests were performed in reagent grade acids under laboratory conditions; field tests are encouraged prior to industrial use.

Hydrochloric Acid

Conc. Wt.% 50°F 75°F 100°F 125°F 150°F 175°F 200°F 225°F Boiling
10°C 24°C 38°C 52°C 66°C 79°C 93°C 107°C
1 - - - - - - - - 0.05
1.5 - - - - - - - - -
2 - - - - - - <0.01 - 0.05
2.5 - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 17.83 - -
3 - - - - <0.01 <0.01 - - -
3.5 - - - - - - - - -
4 - - - - - - - - -
4.5 - - - - - - - - -
5 - - <0.01 - <0.01 1.23 17.08 - -
7.5 - - <0.01 0.47 0.97 - - - -
10 - <0.01 0.17 1.49 - - - - -
15 0.09 0.19 0.52 - - - - - -
20 0.08 0.15 0.42 - - - - - -
All corrosion rates are in millimeters per year (mm/y); to convert to mils (thousandths of an inch) per year, divide by 0.0254.
Data are from Corrosion Laboratory Job 44-02.
All tests were performed in reagent grade acids under laboratory conditions; field tests are encouraged prior to industrial use.

Nitric Acid

Conc. Wt.% 50°F 75°F 100°F 125°F 150°F 175°F 200°F 225°F Boiling
10°C 24°C 38°C 52°C 66°C 79°C 93°C 107°C
10 - - - - - - - - -
20 - - - - - - - - <0.01
30 - - - - - - - - -
40 - - - - - - - - 0.01
50 - - - - - - - - 0.03
60 - - - - - - - - 0.06
65 - - - - - - - - 0.07
70 - - - - - - - - 0.10
All corrosion rates are in millimeters per year (mm/y); to convert to mils (thousandths of an inch) per year, divide by 0.0254.
Data are from Corrosion Laboratory Job 6-03.
All tests were performed in reagent grade acids under laboratory conditions; field tests are encouraged prior to industrial use.

Phosphoric Acid

Conc. Wt.% 125°F 150°F 175°F 200°F 225°F 250°F 275°F 300°F Boiling
52°C 66°C 79°C 93°C 107°C 121°C 135°C 149°C
50 - - - - - - - - 0.01
60 - - - - - - - - 0.01
65 - - - - - - - - 0.17
70 - - - - 0.01 0.09 - - 0.11
75 - - - - - 0.12 - - 0.30
80 - - - - 0.07 0.12 0.37 - 0.42
85 - - - - 0.07 0.14 0.31 0.71 0.99
All corrosion rates are in millimeters per year (mm/y); to convert to mils (thousandths of an inch) per year, divide by 0.0254.
Data are from Corrosion Laboratory Jobs 5-03 and 30-04.
All tests were performed in reagent grade acids under laboratory conditions; field tests are encouraged prior to industrial use.

Sulfuric Acid

Conc. Wt.% 75°F 100°F 125°F 150°F 175°F 200°F 225°F 250°F 275°F 300°F 350°F Boiling
24°C 38°C 52°C 66°C 79°C 93°C 107°C 121°C 135°C 149°C 177°C
1 - - - - - - - - - - - -
2 - - - - - - - - - - - -
3 - - - - - - - - - - - -
4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
5 - - - - - - - - - - - 0.07
10 - - - - - <0.01 - - - - - 0.11
20 - - - - - 0.01 - - - - - 0.59
30 - - - - <0.01 2.62 - - - - - -
40 - - - <0.01 <0.01 5.41 - - - - - -
50 - - - <0.01 2.30 - - - - - - -
60 - - - <0.01 2.45 - - - - - - -
70 - <0.01 0.32 1.62 - - - - - - - -
80 - <0.01 <0.01 2.54 - - - - - - - -
90 - <0.01 0.54 3.12 - - - - - - - -
96 - <0.01 0.50 2.84 - - - - - - - -

All corrosion rates are in millimeters per year (mm/y); to convert to mils (thousandths of an inch) per year, divide by 0.0254.
Data are from Corrosion Laboratory Job 45-02.
All tests were performed in reagent grade acids under laboratory conditions; field tests are encouraged prior to industrial use.

Reagent Grade Solutions, mm/y

Chemical Conc. wt.% 100°F 125°F 150°F 175°F 200°F Boiling
38°C 52°C 66°C 79°C 93°C
Acetic Acid 99 - - - - - <0.01
Chromic Acid 10 - - 0.15 - - -
20 - - 0.85 - - -
Formic Acid 88 - - - - - 0.07
Hydrobromic Acid 2.5 - - <0.01 - <0.01 <0.01
5 - - <0.01 - <0.01 <0.01
7.5 - - <0.01 - <0.01 0.02
10 - - <0.01 <0.01 1.12 -
15 - - <0.01 0.42 1.89 -
20 - <0.01 0.44 1.12 - -
30 0.14 0.26 0.46 0.84 - -
40 0.10 0.17 0.31 0.48 - -
Hydrochloric Acid 1 - - - - - 0.05
2 - - - - <0.01 0.05
2.5 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 17.83 -
3 - - <0.01 <0.01 - -
5 <0.01 - <0.01 1.23 - -
7.5 <0.01 0.47 0.97 - - -
10 0.17 1.49 - - - -
15 0.52 - - - - -
20 0.42 - - - - -
Nitric Acid 20 - - - - - <0.01
40 - - - - - 0.01
50 - - - - - 0.03
60 - - - - - 0.06
65 - - - - - 0.07
70 - - - - - 0.10
Phosphoric Acid 50 - - - - - 0.01
60 - - - - - 0.01
70 - - - - - 0.11
75 - - - - - 0.30
80 - - - - - 0.42
Sulfuric Acid 10 - - - - <0.01 0.11
20 - - - - 0.01 0.59
30 - - - <0.01 2.62 -
40 - - <0.01 <0.01 - -
50 - - <0.01 2.30 - -
60 - - <0.01 2.45 - -
70 <0.01 0.32 1.62 - - -
80 <0.01 <0.01 2.54 - - -
90 <0.01 0.54 3.12 - - -
96 <0.01 0.50 2.84 - - -

Resistance to Pitting and Crevice Corrosion

HASTELLOY® G-35® alloy exhibits good resistance to chloride-induced pitting and crevice attack, forms of corrosion to which some of the austenitic stainless steels are particularly prone. To assess the resistance of alloys to pitting and crevice attack, it is customary to measure their Critical Pitting Temperatures and Critical Crevice Temperatures in acidified 6 wt.% ferric chloride, in accordance with the procedures defined in ASTM Standard G 48. These values represent the lowest temperatures at which pitting and crevice attack are encountered in this solution, within 72 hours.

Alloy
Critical Pitting Temperature in Acidified 6% FeCl3
Critical Crevice Temperature in Acidified 6% FeCl3
°F °C °F °C
316L 59 15 32 0
254SMO 140 60 86 30
28 113 45 64 17.5
31 163 72.5 109 42.5
G-30® 131 55 77 25
G-35® 203 95 113 45
625 212 100 104 40

Resistance to Stress Corrosion Cracking

One of the chief attributes of the nickel alloys is their resistance to chloride-induced stress corrosion cracking. A common solution for assessing the resistance of materials to this extremely destructive form of attack is boiling 45% magnesium chloride (ASTM Standard G 36), typically with stressed U-bend samples. As is evident from the following results, G-35® alloy is much more resistant to this form of attack than the comparative, austenitic stainless steels. The tests were stopped after 1,008 hours (six weeks).

Alloy Time to Cracking
316L 2 h
254SMO 24 h
28 36 h
31 36 h
G-30® 168 h
G-35® No Cracking in 1,008 h
625 No Cracking in 1,008 h

Corrosion Resistance of Welds

To assess the resistance of welds to corrosion, Haynes International has chosen to test all-weld-metal samples, taken from the quadrants of cruciform assemblies, created using multiple gas metal arc (MIG) weld passes. Interestingly, the resistance of all-weld-metal samples of G-35 alloy to key, inorganic acids is close to that of the wrought, base metal, and even exceeds it in concentrated sulfuric acid.

Chemical Concentration Temperature Corrosion Rate
wt.% °F °C Weld Metal Wrought Base Metal
mpy mm/y mpy mm/y
H2SO4
30 150 66 <0.4 <0.01 0.4 0.01
H2SO4
50 150 66 <0.4 <0.01 <0.4 <0.01
H2SO4
70 150 66 56.3 1.43 63.8 1.62
H2SO4
90 150 66 66.5 1.69 122.8 3.12
HCl 5 100 38 <0.4 <0.01 <0.4 <0.01
HCl 10 100 38 9.4 0.24 6.7 0.17
HCl 15 100 38 22.0 0.56 20.5 0.52
HCl 20 100 38 17.7 0.45 16.5 0.42
HNO3
70 Boiling 4.7 0.12 3.9 0.10

Physical Properties

Physical Property British Units Metric Units
Density RT
0.297 lb/in3
RT
8.22 g/cm3
Electrical Resistivity RT 46.5 μohm.in RT 1.18 μohm.m
200°F 46.8 μohm.in 100°C 1.19 μohm.m
400°F 47.4 μohm.in 200°C 1.20 μohm.m
600°F 47.7 μohm.in 300°C 1.21 μohm.m
800°F 48.2 μohm.in 400°C 1.22 μohm.m
1000°F 49.0 μohm.in 500°C 1.24 μohm.m
1200°F 49.4 μohm.in 600°C 1.25 μohm.m
Thermal Conductivity RT
70 Btu.in/h.ft2.°F
RT 10 W/m.°C
200°F
82 Btu.in/h.ft2.°F
100°C 12 W/m.°C
400°F
98 Btu.in/h.ft2.°F
200°C 14 W/m.°C
600°F
113 Btu.in/h.ft2.°F
300°C 16 W/m.°C
800°F
127 Btu.in/h.ft2.°F
400°C 18 W/m.°C
1000°F
143 Btu.in/h.ft2.°F
500°C 19 W/m.°C
- - 600°C 23 W/m.°C
Mean Coefficient of Thermal Expansion 77-200°F 6.8 μin/in.°F 21-100°C 12.3 μm/m.°C
77-400°F 7.0 μin/in.°F 21-200°C 12.6 μm/m.°C
77-600°F 7.4 μin/in.°F 21-300°C 13.2 μm/m.°C
77-800°F 7.5 μin/in.°F 21-400°C 13.4 μm/m.°C
77-1000°F 7.7 μin/in.°F 21-500°C 13.6 μm/m.°C
- - 21-600°C 14.1 μm/m.°C
Thermal Diffusivity RT
0.11 ft2/h
RT
0.028 cm2/s
200°F
0.12 ft2/h
100°C
0.031 cm2/s
400°F
0.13 ft2/h
200°C
0.034 cm2/s
600°F
0.15 ft2/h
300°C
0.038 cm2/s
800°F
0.17 ft2/h
400°C
0.042 cm2/s
1000°F
0.18 ft2/h
500°C
0.045 cm2/s
- - 600°C
0.048 cm2/s
Specific Heat RT 0.11 Btu/lb.°F RT 450 J/kg.°C
200°F 0.11 Btu/lb.°F 100°C 470 J/kg.°C
400°F 0.12 Btu/lb.°F 200°C 490 J/kg.°C
600°F 0.12 Btu/lb.°F 300°C 510 J/kg.°C
800°F 0.13 Btu/lb.°F 400°C 530 J/kg.°C
1000°F 0.13 Btu/lb.°F 500°C 530 J/kg.°C
- - 600°C 600 J/kg.°C
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity RT
29.6 x 106psi
RT 204 GPa
600°F
27.4 x 106psi
300°C 190 GPa
800°F
26.5 x 106psi
400°C 184 GPa
1000°F
25.7 x 106psi
500°C 179 GPa
1200°F
24.7 x 106psi
600°C 174 GPa
Melting Range 2430-2482°F - 1332-1361°C -

RT= Room Temperature

Impact Strength

Test Temperature Impact Strength
°F °C ft-lbf J
RT RT 371 503
-320 -196 461 625

Limited data
Impact strengths were generated using Charpy V-notch samples, machined from mill annealed plate.

Tensile Strength and Elongation

Form Thickness/ Bar Diameter Test Temperature 0.2% Offset Yield Strength Ultimate Tensile Strength Elongation
in mm °F °C ksi MPa ksi MPa %
Sheet 0.125 3.2 RT RT 50 345 107 738 60
Sheet 0.125 3.2 200 93 43 296 101 696 63
Sheet 0.125 3.2 400 204 36 248 93 641 64
Sheet 0.125 3.2 600 316 31 214 89 614 70
Sheet 0.125 3.2 800 427 30 207 86 593 74
Sheet 0.125 3.2 1000 538 27 186 80 552 68
Sheet 0.125 3.2 1200 649 26 179 75 517 68
Plate 0.5 12.7 RT RT 46 317 100 689 72
Plate 0.5 12.7 200 93 41 283 97 669 74
Plate 0.5 12.7 400 204 33 228 88 607 75
Plate 0.5 12.7 600 316 29 200 82 565 71
Plate 0.5 12.7 800 427 30 207 78 538 77
Plate 0.5 12.7 1000 538 26 179 72 496 75
Plate 0.5 12.7 1200 649 24 165 68 469 74
Bar 1 25.4 RT RT 46 317 103 710 66
Bar 1 25.4 200 93 41 283 98 676 70
Bar 1 25.4 400 204 35 241 89 614 71
Bar 1 25.4 600 316 30 207 84 579 71
Bar 1 25.4 800 427 31 214 81 558 73
Bar 1 25.4 1000 538 28 193 75 517 72
Bar 1 25.4 1200 649 23 159 69 476 71

RT= Room Temperature

Hardness

Form Hardness, HRBW Typical ASTM Grain Size
Sheet 87 3.5 - 5
Plate 87 2 - 4.5
Bar 82 1 - 4

All samples tested in solution-annealed condition.
HRBW = Hardness Rockwell “B”, Tungsten Indentor.

Welding and Fabrication

HASTELLOY® G-35® alloy is very amenable to the Gas Metal Arc (GMA/MIG), Gas Tungsten Arc (GTA/TIG), and Shielded Metal Arc (SMA/Stick) welding processes.  For matching filler metals (i.e. solid wires and coated electrodes) that are available for these processes, and welding guidelines, please click here.

Wrought products of HASTELLOY® G-35® alloy are supplied in the Mill Annealed (MA) condition, unless otherwise specified. This solution annealing procedure has been designed to optimize the alloy’s corrosion resistance and ductility. Following all hot forming operations, the material should be re-annealed, to restore optimum properties. The alloy should also be re-annealed after any cold forming operations that result in an outer fiber elongation of 7% or more. The annealing temperature for HASTELLOY® G-35® alloy is 1121°C (2050°F), and water quenching is advised (rapid air cooling is feasible with structures thinner than 10 mm (0.375 in). A hold time at the annealing temperature of 10 to 30 minutes is recommended, depending on the thickness of the structure (thicker structures need the full 30 minutes). More details concerning the heat treatment of HASTELLOY® G-35® alloy, click here.

HASTELLOY® G-35® alloy can be hot forged, hot rolled, hot upset, hot extruded, and hot formed. However, it is more sensitive to strain and strain rates than the austenitic stainless steels, and the hot working temperature range is quite narrow. For example, the recommended start temperature for hot forging is 1204°C (2200°F) and the recommended finish temperature is 954°C (1750°F). Moderate reductions and frequent re-heating provide the best results, as described here. This reference also provides guidelines for cold forming, spinning, drop hammering, punching, and shearing of the HASTELLOY® alloys. G-35® alloy is stiffer than most austenitic stainless steels, and more energy is required during cold forming. Also, G-35® alloy work hardens more readily than most austenitic stainless steels, and may require several stages of cold work, with intermediate anneals.

While cold work does not usually affect the resistance of HASTELLOY® G-35® alloy to general corrosion, and to chloride-induced pitting and crevice attack, it can affect resistance to stress corrosion cracking. For optimum corrosion performance, therefore, the re-annealing of cold worked parts (following an outer fiber elongation of 7% or more) is important.

Tensile Data for Weldments

Welding Process Form Test Temperature 0.2% Offset Yield Strength Ultimate Tensile Strength Elongation
°F °C ksi MPa ksi MPa   %
Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW) Transverse Sample from Welded Plate of Thickness 12.7 mm/0.5 in RT RT  63.5  438  101.0  696   44.0
500 260  44.9  310  79.0  545   40.0
1000 538  36.1  249  65.0  448   37.0
Synergic Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) Transverse Sample from Welded Plate of Thickness 12.7 mm/0.5 in RT  RT  66.5  459  105.0  724   31.5
500  260  48.6  335  80.5  555   43.0
1000  538  35.7  246  72.7  501   51.0
All Weld Metal Sample of Diameter 12.7 mm/0.5 in from Cruciform RT  RT  70.5  486  101.0  696   43.0
500  560  48.8  336  78.0  538   46.0
1000  238  43.8  302  64.0  441   42.0

Charpy V-Notch Impact Data for Weldments

Welding Process Form Notch Position Test Temperature Impact Strength
°F  °C   ft.lbf  J
Synergic Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) Transverse Sample from Welded Plate of Thickness 12.7 mm/0.5 in Mid-Weld RT  RT  201  273 
-320  -196  153  207 
Heat Affected Zone RT  RT  >264  >358 
-320  -196  >264  >358

Room Temperature Charpy V-Notch Data for Aged Weldments
(Synergic Gas Metal Arc Welding, Transverse Samples from Welded 12.7 mm Plate)

Notch Position Aging Time Aging Temperature Impact Strength
ºF  ºC  ft.lbf 
Mid-Weld 2000  800  427  223  302 
Mid-Weld  2000  900  482  219  297 
Mid-Weld  2000  1000  538  224  304 
Mid-Weld  2000  1100  593  125  169 
Mid-Weld  2000  1200  649  79  107 

Specifications and Codes

Specifications

HASTELLOY® G-35® alloy (N06035)
Sheet, Plate & Strip SB 575/B 575P= 43
Billet, Rod & Bar SB 574/B 574B 472P= 43
Coated Electrodes SFA 5.11/ A 5.11 (ENiCrMo-22)F= 43
Bare Welding Rods & Wire SFA 5.14/ A 5.14 (ERNiCrMo-22)F= 43
Seamless Pipe & Tube SB 622/B 622P= 43
Welded Pipe & Tube SB 619/B 619SB 626/B 626P= 43
Fittings SB 366/B 366SB 462/B 462P= 43
Forgings SB 564/B 564SB 462/B 462P = 43
DIN No. 2.4643 NiCr33Mo8
TÜV -
Others NACE MR0175ISO 15156ASME Code CaseNo. 2484

Codes

HASTELLOY® G-35® alloy (N06035)
ASME Section l -
Section lll Class 1 -
Class 2 -
Class 3 -
Section Vlll Div. 1
800°F (427°C)1
Div. 2 -
Section Xll -
B16.5
800°F (427°C)2
B16.34
800°F (427°C)2
B31.1 -
B31.3 800°F (427°C)
VdTÜV (doc #) -

1Plate, Sheet, Bar, Forgings, fittings, welded pipe/tube, seamless pipe/tube
2Plate, Bar, Forgings, seamless pipe/tube

Disclaimer

Haynes International makes all reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy and correctness of the data displayed on this site but makes no representations or warranties as to the data’s accuracy, correctness or reliability. All data are for general information only and not for providing design advice. Alloy properties disclosed here are based on work conducted principally by Haynes International, Inc. and occasionally supplemented by information from the open literature and, as such, are indicative only of the results of such tests and should not be considered guaranteed maximums or minimums.  It is the responsibility of the user to test specific alloys under actual service conditions to determine their suitability for a particular purpose.

For specific concentrations of elements present in a particular product and a discussion of the potential health affects thereof, refer to the Safety Data Sheets supplied by Haynes International, Inc.  All trademarks are owned by Haynes International, Inc., unless otherwise indicated.

Alloy Brochure

Download